In Europe, 520,000 of the Land Rover, the price in Japan is 1.05 million, the price in Germany is 1.03 million, the price in the United States is 830,000, while China? Land Rover a dock, paid the taxes and fees, it has been as high as 1.3 million! This is already much higher than in Japan, Germany and the United States, the price of a. Although each was able to sell a car dealer earn 590,000 yuan, but which also includes the overseas transportation costs, domestic transport costs, 4S shop building costs, staff costs and so on.
For Chinese Automobile manufacturers, these exorbitant exactions is their most troublesome problems.
In August this year, CCTV reported an overseas such information a price of only 520,000 yuan of Land Rover Range Rover, but the domestic price will be up to 1.89 million, the CCTV in the form of illustrations explained: the car up after paid the exactions to 1.3 million in the domestic dealers to buy 1.89 million net profit 590 000, which is profiteering! Perhaps there is monopolistic behavior, and urged relevant departments to conduct a serious investigation as soon as possible. After the report is issued, the relevant antitrust authorities began a national survey on imported luxury cars.
But did not mention the automobiles manufacturers for the most troublesome problem, and that is the high exactions in the CCTV report.
In fact, the progress of the relevant antitrust investigation has found that the country has a lot of luxury car dealers in the state do not make money, busy year without loss of even good. Many dealers rely on service and sales of some accessories to make a profit. As for why the sales of imported luxury cars, each car can earn hundreds of thousands, not because of the monopoly, but because of the lack of competition. Why the lack of competition? Real because from 2005 onwards the implementation of "car brand sales management approach." Under the constraint of the "measures", car prices with the dealer will supply control, manufacturing "hunger marketing" for profit. So that's why the car was first started in antitrust imported luxury cars, but it has not opened out a reason for the import of luxury cars antitrust ticket.
Later, with the vehicle's in-depth antitrust and anti-monopoly department becomes the spearhead quietly, began to investigate the monopolistic behavior of domestic car prices. In fact, including the FAW - Volkswagen, including domestic joint venture car prices Honda, Toyota, BMW, Mercedes, Nissan and so received antitrust investigation. But why is the FAW - Volkswagen received a ticket before it?
This only shows that the FAW - Volkswagen doing enough to "be careful" Audi division is actually related to the organization of up to 10 dealers in Hubei "meeting" to negotiate the lowest price, which is obviously open "illegal" behavior. Of course, the meeting also fills most stupid actually require dealers to sign any "price list", "guarantee", which is the antitrust authorities to open a ticket basis. I do not understand, in the "car brand sales management approach" to implement, dealers have been completely "under control" car prices, but also to engage in so-called "price list", "guarantee" for what it? In addition, even if the dealer "not obedient", alerted the court, playing a lawsuit. When to court, this so-called "guarantee" what is the point? Could get out of it? These things not only do not have legal effect, has become a criminal "evidence." Frankly speaking, the Audi division approach on the issue of Hubei substantially equal "residual brain behavior."
This only shows that the FAW - Volkswagen doing enough to "be careful" Audi division is actually related to the organization of up to 10 dealers in Hubei "meeting" to negotiate the lowest price, which is obviously open "illegal" behavior. Of course, the meeting also fills most stupid actually require dealers to sign any "price list", "guarantee", which is the antitrust authorities to open a ticket basis. I do not understand, in the "car brand sales management approach" to implement, dealers have been completely "under control" car prices, but also to engage in so-called "price list", "guarantee" for what it? In addition, even if the dealer "not obedient", alerted the court, playing a lawsuit. When to court, this so-called "guarantee" what is the point? Could get out of it? These things not only do not have legal effect, has become a criminal "evidence." Frankly speaking, the Audi division approach on the issue of Hubei substantially equal "residual brain behavior."
Of course, at a loss to guess which one car prices will be punished, which is obviously a complex issue, in fact, it is not difficult to answer this question. We FAW - Volkswagen fined details can be found, as long as the existence of such "price list" between car companies and dealers, "guarantee" of the class of the agreement, are "iron-clad" inevitably have to eat the ticket. If the FAW - Volkswagen after "obediently" will be fine handed, from the beginning of the case, antitrust authorities to grasp the survey of car prices monopoly "shortcut" experience, make sure some of the evidence, and then "instigation" Some dealers testify . So more car companies and dealers will take "more easy" received a ticket.
To learn more about the topic of low-speed electric vehicles, please visit: http://global.fodayauto.com
No comments:
Post a Comment